I read with growing rage the article written by Robert George, “Prager underling doesn’t dwell on ex-boss’ actions,” BDN, Jan. 3. What a perversion of justice!

There must be another side to the story. Surely a fair-minded man, yes, a judge, would have understood and accorded appropriate weight to each man’s circumstances and character, eh? According to my way of thinking, Mr. Henry exhibited some sterling characteristics, excepting, of course, his running drugs with Harvey Prager, Esq.

Tell me the whole story, please. Why did Judge Carter pass sentences as he did? John H. Ribe Portage