loading...
With regard to the column by Sandor M. Polster titled, “Tale of media paranoia” [the weather station]. It was neat, but how does the fantasy differ from, say, the reality of The Chicago Tribune practices in the 1930s? If we could get from there to here, a little…
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.

With regard to the column by Sandor M. Polster titled, “Tale of media paranoia” [the weather station]. It was neat, but how does the fantasy differ from, say, the reality of The Chicago Tribune practices in the 1930s? If we could get from there to here, a little backsliding in that direction scarcely seems to endanger the republic.

Besides, slanting the news is hardly a sin exclusive to the right. The New York Times is very given to mentioning when a crime is committed with an “automatic weapon,” but never notes that a victim is unarmed.

May I make a suggestion? The tendency of the left to see the right as being driven by paranoia is paranoid in itself. Is it even remotely credible, for instance, that a conservative Congress would act to harm the elderly, a group that votes out of all proportion to its numbers? And yet, that seems to be what liberals believe; how do we explain this if not by the left’s being in the grip of some “demon theory”? John K. Lunde Orono


Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

By continuing to use this site, you give your consent to our use of cookies for analytics, personalization and ads. Learn more.