loading...
This is written to express my complete disagreement with your Dec. 18 editorial. “Justice lynched” criticized the jury decision acquitting the young man in Portland who defended himself from bodily harm when a three-member gang (known troublemakers) appeared, uninvited, at his home in the early morning for other…
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.

This is written to express my complete disagreement with your Dec. 18 editorial. “Justice lynched” criticized the jury decision acquitting the young man in Portland who defended himself from bodily harm when a three-member gang (known troublemakers) appeared, uninvited, at his home in the early morning for other than a peace-loving mission.

Thank God law-abiding citizens in this country still have a constitutional right to defend themselves and their property from intruders. On the facts presented in this case, I compliment the defense attorney, the judge, and, in particular, the jury’s decision upholding Maine’s self-defense law including the use of deadly force. Lloyd M. Painter Owls Head


Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

By continuing to use this site, you give your consent to our use of cookies for analytics, personalization and ads. Learn more.