Forestry planning

I read with interest the article, “Fraser forester blasts proposal” (BDN, Aug 26). As I was quoted several times, I would like to highlight some omissions.

Indeed, Fraser Papers was critical of the changes in forestry regulations. What was not mentioned in the article is that we wish to develop a climate that promotes the analyses of changes in rules and regulations and their long-term effects on forest productivity. Productivity in this case refers to sustainability and enhancement of wood supply, wildlife habitat, biodiversity and other values important to people of the state.

In addition, we believe it is imperative to foster a climate of cooperation and education rather than confrontation — a point reinforced by other speakers at the Presque Isle review session. We believe an open, collaborative climate will contribute to Maine’s forests achieving their full potential and build the foundation for proactive rather than reactive forestry.

There is a need to focus on comprehensive forest management plans that outline how forest resource values are to be maintained. The opportunity is at hand to provide long-term vision and direction rather than tinkering with existing regulations. Sustainable forestry begins with sustainable forest policy — clearly lacking in Maine. Future generations should have the same benefits from the forest that we continue to enjoy.

Given the nature of the forestry, long-term plans are imperative to insure forest productivity and sustainability. All of our foresters want the right to practice scientific forestry — and would like the state to give them the opportunity. We need to cooperate in building a foundation that allows Maine’s forests to be greater than the sum of its parts. Kevin Topolniski, RPF Chief forester and environmental coordinator Fraser Papers Inc. Edmundston, New Brunswick