Billions borrowed

loading...
I found a short article in the business section of your Aug. 1 edition disturbing. Many of your readers may have missed it; it was titled, “Tax cut, weak economy could force government to borrow $51 billion,” and it was next to an unrelated picture of purple ketchup.
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.

I found a short article in the business section of your Aug. 1 edition disturbing. Many of your readers may have missed it; it was titled, “Tax cut, weak economy could force government to borrow $51 billion,” and it was next to an unrelated picture of purple ketchup.

As it turned out, the Treasury Department borrowed $51 billion to pay for the rebate checks this quarter and did not pay down $57 billion of the national debt as it had previously intended to do. These rebate checks are part of the trillion-dollar-plus tax-cut package signed by President Bush and supported by Sens. Snowe and Collins.

Weren’t the rebate checks supposed to come out of the surplus? Why does the Treasury Department need to borrow to pay them? What happened to the surplus? And who pays the interest on this multi-billion-dollar loan? For heaven’s sake (to quote Justice Sandra Day O’Connor), what’s going on here? Fuzzy math (to quote George Bush), except this time, the president did the figuring.

It’s going to get interesting.

Jim Aucoin

Bangor


Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

By continuing to use this site, you give your consent to our use of cookies for analytics, personalization and ads. Learn more.