But you still need to activate your account.
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
David Flanagan approached his run for governor in much the way he steered Central Maine Power Co. toward success: thoughtfully, analytically and, for all the press releases and position papers, quietly. That isn’t surprising given his laconic style, but it rarely wins political races. His departure from the race, announced Thursday, is unfortunate because, while we did not always agree with his outlook, it was hard not to respect his intelligence and sincerity.
Mr. Flanagan’s reason for his departure was characteristic in its bluntness: The polls told him he could not win. And he went further: During the announcement Thursday, he offered to refund contributors’ money. Many politicians would spin an event like this, offering the vague excuse of the need to spend more time with family, or they would find a way to hang on in the race, too embarrassed to leave and convinced that their mere presence elevated the debate. Mr. Flanagan, who had the incentive to be vague and the means to stay in, instead chose an honest assessment of his chances and got out.
He had been busy as a candidate, producing substantial arguments for solutions to the problems vexing Maine. Though this was his first run for office, his health care policy was detailed and skilled. His background as chairman of the University of Maine System trustees gave him experience in education policy. His recommendations for addressing the state’s growing drug-abuse problem were well-informed. His reason for opposing casinos – that they were so financially powerful they could subvert the democratic process – at least was novel.
Public service is a difficult calling. Mr. Flanagan already has given his time and expertise on numerous occasions to the state and didn’t need the knocks and bruises of a campaign. He could have simply sat back and complained about the government, as so many people do. Instead, he saw a state with clear troubles, believed he could help and joined the race. He was not successful, but many of his policy contributions to the race were important, and he deserves the public’s thanks for that.
Comments
comments for this post are closed