Augusta tackles fiscal fronts

loading...
AUGUSTA – For all the belt-tightening trumpeted all session long by budget bargainers, late-session scheming at the State House still revolved around dollar signs Wednesday, with future borrowing one focus, taxes another and additional gambling revenue a third. In fact, fiscal issues were being deliberated…
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.

AUGUSTA – For all the belt-tightening trumpeted all session long by budget bargainers, late-session scheming at the State House still revolved around dollar signs Wednesday, with future borrowing one focus, taxes another and additional gambling revenue a third.

In fact, fiscal issues were being deliberated and debated all day and deep into the night in groups large and small, in venues public and private.

In the full Legislature, lawmakers enacted a fourth unanimous budget measure crafted by the Appropriations Committee.

Designed to offset a $48 million revenue gap in the two-year cycle that begins July 1, the budget measure drew strong support in both the Senate – 30-0 – and House of Representatives – 122-24 – after moves to reopen the package were beaten back.

“It does not raise taxes or fees,” said Democratic Rep. Joseph Brannigan of Portland, the House chairman of the Appropriations panel, citing popular selling points.

Joining in Brannigan’s emphasis on the bipartisan support enjoyed by the measure, Republican Rep. Richard Rosen of Bucksport seconded the call for passage.

As majority Democrats and minority Republicans forged a consensus, he said approvingly, “compromises were made.”

In the Senate, Democrat Mary Cathcart of Orono, the co-chairwoman of the Appropriations panel, also appealed to rank-and-file members to honor the committee’s accord.

“I hope we will not break an agreement that we spent so many hours working toward,” she said in successfully opposing any changes.

Intermittently through the day, legislative leaders moved in and out of Gov. John Baldacci’s office, conferring on the potential scope of new borrowing that might be put before state voters in November.


Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

By continuing to use this site, you give your consent to our use of cookies for analytics, personalization and ads. Learn more.