loading...
Welcome, You're signed in as: {{credentials.userName}}
But you still need to activate your account.
But you still need to activate your account.
I read the column by Stephen Law, “Bush decision will not devastate nation’s rain forest” (BDN, Jan. 5), rebutting a previous column written by Matthew Davis, “Bush decision will devastate America’s rain forest” (BDN, Dec. 31). Both of the columns were about the Tongass National Forest in Alaska.
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
I read the column by Stephen Law, “Bush decision will not devastate nation’s rain forest” (BDN, Jan. 5), rebutting a previous column written by Matthew Davis, “Bush decision will devastate America’s rain forest” (BDN, Dec. 31). Both of the columns were about the Tongass National Forest in Alaska.
Law did a wonderful job rebutting the information put forth in Davis’ commentary. It’s nice to read something from someone who knows what he is talking about. I hope more people read it.
W.L. (Tony) Bartley Jr.
Greenville
Comments
comments for this post are closed