R.I. casino supporters push for vote

loading...

WEST WARWICK, R.I. – Two nights a week after work waiting tables, Debbie Kiselica joins other volunteers at the Main Street headquarters of Harrah’s Entertainment and the Narragansett Indian Tribe.

Using cue cards with project highlights, they call residents around the state to conduct informal telephone polls on a proposed $600 million casino, and to spread promises of jobs and tax revenues that have been echoing through this old mill town for five years.

Kiselica’s casino dream is not to strike it rich playing slots, but to get a decent job. “I’ve been in the [restaurant] business for 30 years, none had benefits,” the Scituate mother of two said.

Voters this year could be asked to choose between the project’s promise – thousands of jobs and an economic infusion for a blue-collar town and a struggling tribe – and opponents’ pleas to not expand gambling.

The issues being raised in the Rhode Island campaign, as well as the proposal itself, bear striking similarities to those advanced last year in Maine by the Penobscot and Passamaquoddy Indians.

Last November, Maine voters overwhelmingly rejected the tribes’ plan to develop a $650 million casino in a blue-collar town in the southern part of the state. Hoping to sway voters their way, supporters said the resort-casino would create 10,000 new jobs and generate $100 million a year in state revenues.

Even though the Indian casino proposal went down by a 2-1 margin in Maine, voters the same day approved slot machines at harness racing tracks. A Pennsylvania company wants to run a “racino” at Bangor Raceway and state gambling regulations are being drafted now.

The debate in Rhode Island has played out for months through advertising on billboards, buses, radio airwaves and most recently in legislative hearings. Lawmakers must agree to put the project on the November statewide ballot before voters can weigh in.

Las Vegas-based Harrah’s, which is working with the tribe to open a casino and would give the tribe a cut of the profits, is betting on Rhode Islanders’ already healthy appetite for gambling and the state’s reliance on it to persuade voters to let them build a casino.

Rhode Island leads the nation in per-capita spending on lottery-sponsored gambling, at nearly $1,200 per person in fiscal 2003, according to the North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries.

Much of that spending is done at two existing gambling parlors in Lincoln and Newport, which also attract customers from outside Rhode Island. This year those businesses will contribute $220 million in revenues to the state from slot machines.

As part of its lobbying efforts, Harrah’s, which operates 26 casinos in 12 states, has flown gambling proponents into Rhode Island from around the country, including Tom Hanafan, mayor of Council Bluffs, Iowa.

“I heard all the negative information, that local businesses would close and restaurants couldn’t compete,” Hanafan said. But eight years after gambling on two riverboats and at a dog track were approved, the dire predictions haven’t come true, he said. “Gaming has improved our community.”

Tourism has picked up, the community of 58,000 has more restaurants now than it did before and 3,500 jobs have been added, Hanafan said.

Harrah’s has promised more than 3,200 direct jobs and $150 million in state and local taxes in its first year of operation in West Warwick. The company wants to compete primarily for Massachusetts and Rhode Island customers now traveling to Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods Resort and Casino in Connecticut.

Massachusetts and Rhode Island residents spent $829 million and $301 million, respectively, last year at those casinos, according to the University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth Center for Policy Analysis.

But Lincoln Park and Newport Grand worry a Rhode Island casino not only would siphon business from two of the most profitable casinos in the world, but steal their customers too.

Gov. Don Carcieri told a House panel last month he’s “gravely concerned we are about to get on a path that will change the whole nature of what our state is about.”

“The dirty little secret about casinos is that basically, a casino wants to create a wasteland around it,” the Republican governor said.

Despite the opposition, House Speaker William Murphy, D-West Warwick, expects the Harrah’s project to get on the statewide ballot.

“We’ve seen the success casinos have had in Connecticut,” Murphy said. “I think it is something the people of Rhode Island deserve to vote on.”

Whether voters would support the binding question is another matter.

A poll released in March by Rhode Island College found more than three-quarters of those surveyed supported a statewide vote on a casino. But only four in 10 said they would back the idea.

The Narragansetts have spent five years trying to develop a West Warwick casino, but Harrah’s will own it.

Unlike other federally recognized tribes, the Narragansetts can’t build a casino on their reservation land, or anywhere else, without voter approval. The 2,800-member tribe has struggled with high unemployment and many have turned to Connecticut’s two Indian-run casinos for jobs, Chief Sachem Matthew Thomas says.

It’s not unusual for gambling interests to target economically depressed areas such as West Warwick, says Earl Grinols, an economics professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who has long studied the gambling industry.

In a small state such as Rhode Island, the cost-benefit analysis needed could well include the project’s effect on the entire state, he says.

“You have to add up all the winners and losers,” Grinols said. “The guys who win tend to be the owner of the casino.”