State appeals Tobacco Delivery Law ruling

loading...
AUGUSTA – Maine Attorney General Steven Rowe said Friday that he has appealed a federal judge’s decision that invalidated a significant portion of a 2003 state law aimed at preventing youth access to tobacco from Internet and mail-order sales. Maine’s law required procedures to verify…
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.

AUGUSTA – Maine Attorney General Steven Rowe said Friday that he has appealed a federal judge’s decision that invalidated a significant portion of a 2003 state law aimed at preventing youth access to tobacco from Internet and mail-order sales.

Maine’s law required procedures to verify that those who purchase tobacco by mail are old enough to do so. It was designed in part to prevent youths from ordering cigarettes online and also to assist the state in collecting taxes that would otherwise be unpaid.

U.S. District Judge D. Brock Hornby said that while Maine’s statute was well-intentioned, it ran afoul of federal interstate commerce laws by impeding delivery services.

Rowe disagreed with Hornby’s conclusion.

“We believe that the states have well-established powers to adopt laws that keep youth from smoking,” Rowe said Friday. “While we would welcome a federal law that accomplished the same goals as the Maine law, we do not believe that the people of Maine should have to wait for Congress to muster the courage to enact similar legislation.”

Maine is one of 16 states that have passed laws restricting home delivery tobacco sales.

Under the Maine law, the person to whom the tobacco products are addressed must be at least 18 years old and must sign for the package. If the buyer is under 27, a government-issued identification must be shown at the time of delivery.

After the law was enacted, UPS announced it would no longer make consumer tobacco deliveries in Maine. UPS was joined by members of regional motor transport associations in challenging the law in U.S. District Court.

On May 27, Hornby ruled that states can regulate contraband only if it does not “significantly affect a carrier’s prices, routes or services.”

His ruling traced federal

pre-emption of interstate commerce to an 1887 law. While Congress has written into the law some areas that are exempt from federal pre-emption, the Maine Tobacco Delivery Law “fits none of the exemptions,” the judge wrote.


Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

By continuing to use this site, you give your consent to our use of cookies for analytics, personalization and ads. Learn more.