Study shows health risks of some farmed salmon European fish may have more contaminants

loading...
ALBANY, N.Y. – Before rushing to make salmon a staple of a heart-healthy diet, consumers should check the origin of their fish supply, a new study recommends. It turns out where the salmon comes from and what they are fed determine whether the health risks…
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.

ALBANY, N.Y. – Before rushing to make salmon a staple of a heart-healthy diet, consumers should check the origin of their fish supply, a new study recommends.

It turns out where the salmon comes from and what they are fed determine whether the health risks will outweigh the benefits, according to the study recently published in the Journal of Nutrition.

Researchers found that the contaminant levels in farmed salmon from certain regions of the world increased the risk of cancer enough to outweigh the heart health benefits.

The toxin levels were so high in some farmed salmon from Europe that people should only eat a single serving once every five months, the study found.

“That’s pretty horrendous,” said David Carpenter, lead author of the study and director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the state University at Albany’s School of Public Health.

Salmon industry representatives said the study was skewed in its sampling methods for both wild and farmed salmon, and that it was funded by opponents of salmon farming.

More importantly, salmon feed manufacturers and farmers in the past few years have changed how they manufacture and handle feed in an effort to keep contaminants to a minimum, said Sebastian Belle of the Maine Aquaculture Association.

Belle said there are contaminants everywhere in the environment, but that the salmon aquaculture industry regularly tests its feed and abides by governmental standards.

“The PCB levels detected in New Brunswick and Maine fish are a tenth of the level that is a threshold concern at the FDA,” he said.

According to Carpenter’s study, the toxin levels in wild salmon weren’t high enough to exceed the health benefits, but the same wasn’t true for farmed salmon, which are raised on a diet of fish oil.

The level of contaminants in fish oil – often derived from local fish – vary depending on the region of the world.

Farmed salmon from South America had the lowest level of pollutants followed by farmed salmon from North America. Salmon from Europe had the highest level of pollutants, according to the study.

“We think it’s because that area’s been industrialized much longer,” Carpenter said.

Prompted by other studies indicating that fish oil increases the levels of toxins in farm-raised salmon, some fish farmers in recent years have switched to using vegetable oil pellets.

But a study last year found the heart health benefits from fish such as salmon were weakened when they were fed vegetable oil instead of fish oil.

That’s not a call for people to shun farmed salmon, however.

Salmon and other fatty fishes such as mackerel and sardines are rich in omega-3 fatty acids, the healthy fat that scientists say raises the “good” HDL cholesterol and lowers the “bad” triglicerides. The AHA recommends people eat fish – particularly fatty fishes – at least twice a week.

Recent studies from Scotland have reported that feeding salmon vegetable oils except in the final stages of farming resulted in salmon with significantly lower levels of contaminants but with most of the omega-3 fatty acids obtained from the standard diet.

“We’re not opposed to farmed salmon, just how it’s farmed. The industry can reduce the level of toxins by changing how they feed [the salmon],” Carpenter said.


Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

By continuing to use this site, you give your consent to our use of cookies for analytics, personalization and ads. Learn more.