November 22, 2024
Business

Bottlers to sue Seattle law firm Companies say lawyers poorly handled Poland Spring case

PORTLAND – Three small water bottlers are seeking compensation from a Seattle law firm that they say caused the breakup of a $39 million settlement with the owners of Poland Spring in order to pursue a more lucrative class-action lawsuit.

The U.S. District Court trial, which began Tuesday and is expected to last three weeks, pits the small bottlers, including a New York-based firm co-owned by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., against Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, a firm that specializes in class-action work.

Maine companies Glenwood Farms Inc. and Carrabassett Spring Water, along with Kennedy’s Tear of the Clouds LLC, say Hagens Berman was assisting them with their case against Poland Spring but defected at the last minute and filed class-action claims in five states, causing Poland Spring’s parent company to withdraw its offer.

The companies say the breakup of the deal negotiated for them in 2003 by Jan Schlichtmann, the flamboyant lawyer portrayed by John Travolta in the 1999 film “A Civil Action” cost them millions of dollars.

The case is rooted in a claim that Poland Spring was mislabeled because it is pumped from wells, not a spring, and could contain surface contamination.

The settlement reportedly would have required Poland Spring’s owner, Nestle Waters North America, to refund $2.5 million to customers, donate $2.5 million to charity and agree to testing and review of its water quality by independent inspectors.

In his opening statement on behalf of the small companies, attorney William Robitzek said his clients were abandoned by Hagens Berman, which had a duty to protect their interests but was driven by greed to violate legal ethics.

“Their interest was in the big bucks,” Robitzek said.

Defense attorney Peter DeTroy said the law firm could not accept the deal because it came at the expense of the consumers Hagens Berman represented as a class.

“[Hagens Berman] knew this was an effort to sabotage the class,” DeTroy said of the settlement. “It was not the right thing to do and they had no obligation to approve” the deal.

Schlictmann’s battle on behalf of families in Woburn, Mass., whose children’s leukemia was linked to industrial pollution, was the subject of the book and film “A Civil Action.” He took on the Poland Spring case after being told in 2002 that its water does not come from a naturally occurring spring, but is pumped from wells and trucked to bottling plants.

In the opinion of some hydrologists, Schlichtmann found, the water is pumped at such volume that it could include potentially contaminated surface water drawn from ponds and other bodies of water.

Schlichtmann could not handle such a complex case on his own, DeTroy said, so he brought in Hagens Berman.

Robitzek said the plaintiffs hoped to avoid a lawsuit and negotiate a deal that would get Poland Spring to correct its problems without a public disclosure that would damage the entire Maine bottled water industry.

DeTroy disagreed, saying suing Nestle was always a possibility, especially after the company offered only $20 million in response to a demand for $150 million.

When Hagens Berman filed lawsuits, Nestle withdrew its offer.

The class-action cases were resolved in November 2003, when an Illinois judge voted to accept a $12.1 million settlement with consumers. Most people received coupons for Poland Spring water, but the lead plaintiff received $12,000. His lawyer, who was not associated with Hagens Berman, was awarded $810,000 in fees.

Poland Spring did not have to change its label, said company spokeswoman Jane Lazgin. “We’re spring water, we live up to every definition of spring water,” she said. “These are allegations and nothing more.”


Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

You may also like