Howard Street back on Bangor agenda

loading...
BANGOR – A pair of agenda items aimed at providing residents of Howard Street and surrounding areas some relief from mounting traffic are back on track and will be among the items city councilors take up at 7:30 p.m. Monday during a regular meeting at City Hall.
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.

BANGOR – A pair of agenda items aimed at providing residents of Howard Street and surrounding areas some relief from mounting traffic are back on track and will be among the items city councilors take up at 7:30 p.m. Monday during a regular meeting at City Hall.

City councilors were slated to take up two agenda items during their Feb. 12 meeting. Action on those items was postponed at the request of Howard Street resident Bob Cimbollek, a neighborhood representative who has been working with city officials to address increasing traffic congestion and speed.

Howard Street is part of a route drivers often use as a shortcut to Stillwater Avenue and the busy Bangor Mall shopping area.

The recommendations, developed by transportation engineer John Theriault of the Bangor firm Ames A/E, aim to keep Howard Street accessible for residents and emergency vehicles while making it less attractive for through motorists.

The proposed fixes would cost about $25,000 to implement, City Engineer Jim Ring said during a recent council subcommittee meeting.

The three recommendations call for:

. Building a small island in the center of Howard Street where it intersects with Angela Street. The island would require motorists to slow down while driving around it.

. Building a raised crosswalk, also known as a speed table, on Howard Street, about 550 feet north of Garland Street. The crosswalk would connect the sidewalks on either side of the street, which Theriault said would help reduce driver speeds in this location.

. Limiting access to Howard Street to right in-right out movements.

Because the first two proposals proved acceptable to city officials and East Side residents surveyed in January, they will be the subject of one council order. The third item will be handled in a separate order because some council members think that plan needs more study.


Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

By continuing to use this site, you give your consent to our use of cookies for analytics, personalization and ads. Learn more.