Appeals court hears gas mileage arguments

loading...
SAN FRANCISCO – Attorneys for 11 states, including Maine, and several environmental groups told a federal appeals court Monday that the Bush administration failed to consider global warming when setting new gas mileage rules. The plaintiffs, led by California’s attorney general, told the 9th U.S.
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.

SAN FRANCISCO – Attorneys for 11 states, including Maine, and several environmental groups told a federal appeals court Monday that the Bush administration failed to consider global warming when setting new gas mileage rules.

The plaintiffs, led by California’s attorney general, told the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that federal regulators ignored the effects of carbon dioxide emissions when calculating fuel economy standards for light trucks and sport utility vehicles.

The new mileage standards, announced in March 2006, require an increase in the average fuel economy for all passenger trucks sold in the United States from 22.2 miles a gallon to 23.5 miles a gallon by 2010.

Speaking outside the courthouse, Attorney General Jerry Brown called the increase “pathetic” and said it “has the hand of lobbying, not the mind of science.”

Attorneys for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which sets the mileage standards, called the cost of greenhouse emissions from vehicles “unquantifiable” and said prioritizing their reduction went beyond the agency’s legal mandate.


Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

By continuing to use this site, you give your consent to our use of cookies for analytics, personalization and ads. Learn more.