Participating in the Alcohol Dependence and Abuse class at the University of Maine has proven to be an eye-opening experience. Prior to this class, I was naive about the complexities of addiction and held a one-dimensional, traditional view toward anyone who struggled with alcohol or drug dependence. Somewhere in my past, I internalized that “alcoholism” was a disease, and believed that “once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic,” regardless of whether an individual remained sober for years.

We all know someone who either has been labeled an alcoholic, or may refer to him or herself as such. Many who suffer from addiction and dependence issues accept labels without question because of low self-efficacy, guilt and shame, and it’s what they’re told they are.

Consequently, when relapse occurs, the alcohol-dependent person is criticized for being unmotivated and lacking the self-discipline necessary to “beat this thing.” Society has a range of vision which defines the only acceptable standard as total abstinence. Some treatment programs eject members from the group if they experience relapse. I feel this approach is devoid of compassion and can inadvertently contribute to treatment failure. Research has shown this to be the case.

Is success a question of utilizing a good dose of self-control and self-discipline? The answer is no. There is often so much more behind excessive drinking behaviors (or any substance use) than meets the eye.

Labeling over-simplifies a number of complex variables which may contribute to addictive behaviors and can deprive individuals of their own uniqueness. Do not misunderstand my point – I do believe there are people who have genetic predispositions and personality traits that increase their likelihood of becoming addicted to alcohol or other substances, just as there are people who will never struggle with addiction.

Rethink the labels we attach to people. Ramifications of labeling and adhering to a no-tolerance standard could actually hinder a sufferer’s progress.

Leslie Brown

Bangor