loading...
Welcome, You're signed in as: {{credentials.userName}}
But you still need to activate your account.
But you still need to activate your account.
In the Aug. 9 Bangor Daily News, a column, “Unity elusive in debate over candidates cleavage” by Charlotte Allen was grossly overstated. The column, in some length, dealt with Hillary Rodham Clinton’s cleavage. In all the pictures I have ever seen, she had never been overexposed. I doubt…
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
In the Aug. 9 Bangor Daily News, a column, “Unity elusive in debate over candidates cleavage” by Charlotte Allen was grossly overstated. The column, in some length, dealt with Hillary Rodham Clinton’s cleavage. In all the pictures I have ever seen, she had never been overexposed. I doubt if she ever will be, unless she appears in a very brief two-piece bikini; which I very much doubt. Washington Post writer Robin Givhan is also wrong. She does not resemble Elizabeth I, Catherine the Great, or Empress Maria Theresa.
Mrs. Clinton is a properly attired, well-qualified candidate for the office for which she is aspiring. She stands out far above the group of those also running. All hail Mrs. Clinton.
Ray E. Hanscom
Marshfield
Comments
comments for this post are closed