It’s more than just marginally interesting that whenever welfare is the topic of discussion, the true costs to the nonwelfare society are never discussed. The Bangor Daily News series “Welfare in Maine” is no exception.

When the modern concept of “aid” was introduced back in the 1930s, fully 25 percent of the population of the U.S. was unable to find work. “Mother’s aid” (as it was called then) was a necessary lifeline for families to hold while the government towed the economy back on the highway. It is no secret that along with truly concerned folks, welfare got a big push from grocers and landlords who were ultimate beneficiaries of these programs.

Now welfare moves billions of dollars from hand to hand. These programs affect every person in this country. Food prices, housing costs and heating expenses are all higher because of the large governmental infusions of cash through welfare to grocers, landlords and fuel distributors. Can’t afford my product? Just go down to the state and fill out a form. Does anyone see the landslide effect?

There is another issue that must be addressed: personal responsibility. Is it responsible to have another child when unable to afford the ones you have? We are heading into a serious downturn in national fortune. There will be more people chasing fewer welfare dollars.

Harry H. Synder III

Whiting