Exemption sought in Canada lynx case

loading...
Maine’s largest timberland owners are once again asking to be exempt from a federal designation affecting thousands of square miles of Canada lynx territory in a handful of states. Nearly two years ago, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service excluded all land in the state…
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.

Maine’s largest timberland owners are once again asking to be exempt from a federal designation affecting thousands of square miles of Canada lynx territory in a handful of states.

Nearly two years ago, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service excluded all land in the state from the controversial “critical habitat” provision of the Endangered Species Act.

At the time, federal biologists argued that Maine’s timberland owners already work well with biologists and researchers to protect populations of the threatened wildcat. Environmental groups, however, accused the agency of caving in to Maine’s large forest products industry.

An ensuing political meddling scandal in Washington, D.C., prompted the agency to scrap the entire critical habitat designation for lynx last year. A revised critical habitat proposal, released earlier this year, reinserted 10,600 square miles of lynx territory encompassing much of northern Maine.

But Maine landowners are once again petitioning for exclusion. To bolster the request, the Maine Forest Products Council has put forward a detailed, voluntary conservation plan that representatives claim will benefit the lynx more than additional federal oversight.

“What we are proposing is something different,” said Patrick Strauch, executive director of the Maine Forest Products Council, whose members own nearly 75 percent of the land within the proposed designation. “It’s designed to determine what is best for the biology of the species, and our feet are held to the fire by the outcomes.”

“Critical habitat” designation means that a landowner or developer must submit to an additional layer of bureaucratic review for any projects involving federal money or permits.

The vast majority of reviewed projects are allowed to go forward as planned, and projects on private land that do not have any federal involvement are not subject to additional review. Yet many landowners, distrustful of the federal wildlife law, strongly oppose designation.

Strauch said his organization’s membership fear critical habitat designation could become a way for other groups to use the courts to force landowners to change their practices. Strauch and others argue that Maine has the largest lynx population in the lower 48 states because of the forest products industry.

The conservation agreement includes: continued funding for lynx-related research, including habitat mapping and modeling; development of landscape-scale planning guidelines for both lynx and other species; annual monitoring and reporting; development of additional training on lynx management for woods workers.

“It’s not prescriptive. It is outcome-based,” Strauch said. “It provides the [Fish and Wildlife] Service with a pretty valuable relationship with the landowners.”

The agency also has proposed exempting five landowners that are working with federal biologists to develop lynx management plans for 680,000 acres in Maine through the federal Healthy Forest Restoration Act.

Environmental groups will likely contest the exclusion of Maine’s commercial forests.

Tara Thornton, Maine organizer for the Endangered Species Coalition, said it’s an improvement that the voluntary lynx-management agreements will be in writing this time. But Thornton said studies have shown that species fare better when critical habitat has been designated.

“We feel critical habitat in Maine is important for the recovery of the lynx,” she said. “We want to see that the land they need to thrive and recover is protected.”

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is accepting public comments on the Canada lynx critical habitat proposal, a draft economic analysis accompanying the proposal as well as the potential exclusions. Comments will be accepted through Nov. 20 at: Public Comment Processing, Attn: FWS-R6-ES-2008-0026, Division of Policy and Directives Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 222, Arlington, VA 22203.

Comments also can be filed electronically by going to www.regulations.gov and following the instructions for submitting comments.

The service also will hold a public informational meeting from 2 to 4 p.m. Nov. 10 at the Black Bear Inn in Orono. Agency staff will give an overview of the proposal and answer any questions.

Correction: This article ran on page B1 in the State edition.

Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

By continuing to use this site, you give your consent to our use of cookies for analytics, personalization and ads. Learn more.