loading...
Welcome, You're signed in as: {{credentials.userName}}
But you still need to activate your account.
But you still need to activate your account.
OAKLAND, Calif. – In a Nov. 25 story about a medical marijuana hearing coming before the Supreme Court, The Associated Press reported erroneously that part of the question before justices involved whether states could adopt such laws. That specific issue is not part of the case before the…
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
OAKLAND, Calif. – In a Nov. 25 story about a medical marijuana hearing coming before the Supreme Court, The Associated Press reported erroneously that part of the question before justices involved whether states could adopt such laws. That specific issue is not part of the case before the court. Rather, the justices will decide whether federal agents have the authority to prosecute individuals who are abiding by their state’s medical marijuana law.
Comments
comments for this post are closed