loading...
Welcome, You're signed in as: {{credentials.userName}}
But you still need to activate your account.
But you still need to activate your account.
An April 15 story on Page B8, “Micmacs’ case sent to federal court/Decision’s language strongly implies tribes are not subject to state law,” may have given the erroneous impression that the Micmacs are contemplating developing a casino. According to Douglas J. Lockerman, attorney for the tribe, he is…
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
An April 15 story on Page B8, “Micmacs’ case sent to federal court/Decision’s language strongly implies tribes are not subject to state law,” may have given the erroneous impression that the Micmacs are contemplating developing a casino. According to Douglas J. Lockerman, attorney for the tribe, he is unaware of any plans for a casino or plans for litigation that would act as a way for the Aroostook Band of Micmacs to bring a casino to the area.
Comments
comments for this post are closed