loading...
Welcome, You're signed in as: {{credentials.userName}}
But you still need to activate your account.
But you still need to activate your account.
A story on Page B1 of Saturday’s paper about FERC’s dismissal of Quoddy LNG’s application to build a liquefied natural gas terminal in Washington County inaccurately referred to an “existing LNG pipeline in Baileyville.” The facility in Baileyville handles natural gas, not LNG. A caption…
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
Sign in or Subscribe to view this content.
A story on Page B1 of Saturday’s paper about FERC’s dismissal of Quoddy LNG’s application to build a liquefied natural gas terminal in Washington County inaccurately referred to an “existing LNG pipeline in Baileyville.” The facility in Baileyville handles natural gas, not LNG.
A caption accompanying a photograph showing removal of a cistern in Searsport on Page B6 in the Oct. 17 paper contained an error. The company doing the work was Wardwell Contracting, a division of Lane Construction Corp.
Comments
comments for this post are closed